Barbados vs Czechia: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Barbados
0 kt per person
in 2024
Czechia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Barbados rank
130th
Czechia rank
128th
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Barbados
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Barbados, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 130th and Czechia ranks 128th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Barbados |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Barbados |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per capita, Barbados or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per capita between Barbados and Czechia?
- 0 kt per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Czechia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Czechia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Barbados ranks 130th and Czechia ranks 128th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.