China vs Ecuador: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

China
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
92nd
Ecuador rank
91st

Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Ecuador
00000199020062023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

China ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 91st of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, China or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between China and Ecuador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Ecuador rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
China ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 91st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Ecuador: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-fires-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/china/ecuador/">China vs Ecuador: Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
190 places, 6,313 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Savanna fires — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.