Argentina vs Canada: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Argentina
2 kt
in 2024
Canada
3 kt
in 2024
Argentina rank
27th
Canada rank
25th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Argentina
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 3 kt against 2 kt in Argentina, a difference of 1 kt.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.5 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 27th and Canada ranks 25th of 221 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.14 kt | 1.8 kt | 3.34 kt | Argentina |
| 2000s | 6.01 kt | 1.01 kt | 5 kt | Argentina |
| 2010s | 3.36 kt | 1.49 kt | 1.87 kt | Argentina |
| 2020s | 3.58 kt | 2.95 kt | 0.6349 kt | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Argentina or Canada?
- Canada, at 3 kt against 2 kt in Argentina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Argentina and Canada?
- 1 kt, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Canada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Canada rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Argentina ranks 27th and Canada ranks 25th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.