Austria vs Barbados: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Austria
0 kt
in 2024
Barbados
0 kt
in 2024
Austria rank
137th
Barbados rank
137th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Austria
- Barbados
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Barbados, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 137th and Barbados ranks 137th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Barbados in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Austria |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Austria or Barbados?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Barbados as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Austria and Barbados?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Barbados?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Barbados rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Austria ranks 137th and Barbados ranks 137th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.