Barbados vs Sweden: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Barbados
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Barbados rank
137th
Sweden rank
137th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Barbados
- Sweden
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Barbados ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 137th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0011 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Barbados or Sweden?
- Barbados, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Barbados and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Sweden rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Barbados ranks 137th and Sweden ranks 137th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.