Belgium vs Norway: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Belgium
0 kt
in 2024
Norway
0 kt
in 2024
Belgium rank
137th
Norway rank
137th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Belgium
- Norway
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Belgium ranks 137th and Norway ranks 137th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0009 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Belgium or Norway?
- Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Belgium and Norway?
- 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Norway?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Norway rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 137th and Norway ranks 137th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.