Chile vs Costa Rica: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Chile
0.0369 kt
in 2024
Costa Rica
0.0221 kt
in 2024
Chile rank
77th
Costa Rica rank
79th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Chile
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0369 kt against 0.0221 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0148 kt.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.7 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 79th of 221 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0528 kt | 0.0147 kt | 0.0381 kt | Chile |
| 2000s | 0.0333 kt | 0.0176 kt | 0.0157 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0728 kt | 0.0251 kt | 0.0476 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0551 kt | 0.0201 kt | 0.035 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Chile or Costa Rica?
- Chile, at 0.0369 kt against 0.0221 kt in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Chile and Costa Rica?
- 0.0148 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Chile ranks 77th and Costa Rica ranks 79th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.