Ecuador vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Ecuador
0.0777 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0.0579 kt
in 2024
Ecuador rank
67th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0777 kt against 0.0579 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0198 kt.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0211 kt | 0.0291 kt | 0.008 kt | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.0233 kt | 0.0238 kt | 0.0005 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0347 kt | 0.0404 kt | 0.0057 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0519 kt | 0.0462 kt | 0.0056 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 0.0777 kt against 0.0579 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0.0198 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.