Kazakhstan vs Malawi: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O)
Kazakhstan
0.4332 kt
in 2024
Malawi
0.3634 kt
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
44th
Malawi rank
47th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Malawi
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4332 kt against 0.3634 kt in Malawi, a difference of 0.0698 kt.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Malawi ranks 47th of 221 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.19 kt | 0.4925 kt | 5.7 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 8.86 kt | 0.4846 kt | 8.38 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 5.21 kt | 0.473 kt | 4.73 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2.04 kt | 0.3995 kt | 1.64 kt | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Kazakhstan or Malawi?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4332 kt against 0.3634 kt in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 0.0698 kt, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malawi?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Malawi rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Malawi ranks 47th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.