Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Savanna fires — Emissions
Namibia
1.28 kt
in 2024
Zimbabwe
1.16 kt
in 2024
Namibia rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
35th
Savanna fires — Emissions over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 1.28 kt against 1.16 kt in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.12 kt.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.1 kt | 4.08 kt | 2.02 kt | Namibia |
| 2000s | 6.35 kt | 4.03 kt | 2.31 kt | Namibia |
| 2010s | 6.82 kt | 3.4 kt | 3.42 kt | Namibia |
| 2020s | 4.7 kt | 1.7 kt | 3 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Namibia, at 1.28 kt against 1.16 kt in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.12 kt, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna fires — emissions?
- Namibia ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 35th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.