Brazil vs Eswatini: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Brazil
0 kt per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
25th
Eswatini rank
26th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Brazil
- Eswatini
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 25th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 188 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita, Brazil or Eswatini?
- Brazil, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita between Brazil and Eswatini?
- 0 kt per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 25th and Eswatini ranks 26th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.