Cuba vs Liberia: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2024
Liberia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
58th
Liberia rank
60th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Cuba
- Liberia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Liberia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Liberia ahead.
Cuba ranks 58th and Liberia ranks 60th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Liberia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Liberia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Liberia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita, Cuba or Liberia?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Liberia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita between Cuba and Liberia?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Liberia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Liberia rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 58th and Liberia ranks 60th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.