Ecuador vs Rwanda: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
67th
Rwanda rank
69th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 188 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 67th and Rwanda ranks 69th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.