Japan vs Jordan: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Japan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Jordan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Japan rank
123rd
Jordan rank
120th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Japan
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Japan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.8 times Japan's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jordan ahead.
Japan ranks 123rd and Jordan ranks 120th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Jordan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Japan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita, Japan or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Japan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita between Japan and Jordan?
- 0 kt per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Jordan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Jordan rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Japan ranks 123rd and Jordan ranks 120th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.