Iceland vs Switzerland: Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC
Iceland
0 kt
in 2020
Switzerland
0.0001 kt
in 2020
Iceland rank
18th
Switzerland rank
16th
Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC over time
- Iceland
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Iceland, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 18th and Switzerland ranks 16th of 19 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0037 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0036 kt | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna fires — emissions (n2o) — unfccc, Iceland or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in savanna fires — emissions (n2o) — unfccc between Iceland and Switzerland?
- 0.0001 kt, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Switzerland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Switzerland rank globally for savanna fires — emissions (n2o) — unfccc?
- Iceland ranks 18th and Switzerland ranks 16th of 19 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna fires — Emissions (N2O) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.