Brazil vs Tanzania: Share of global CO₂ emissions and population

Brazil
1.6%
in 2100
Tanzania
2.6%
in 2100
Brazil rank
13th
Tanzania rank
10th

Share of global CO₂ emissions and population over time

  • Brazil
  • Tanzania
01234100015502100

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 2.6% against 1.6% in Brazil, a difference of 1.0%.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.6 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 318 shared years of data; in 1000 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 13th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 239 countries.

Across the 48 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 32 and Tanzania in 16.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tanzania Difference Ahead
1000s 3.5% 0.2% 3.3% Brazil
1100s 3.2% 0.3% 2.8% Brazil
1200s 3.1% 0.4% 2.7% Brazil
1300s 3.3% 0.5% 2.8% Brazil
1400s 3.7% 0.6% 3.1% Brazil
1500s 3.7% 0.3% 3.4% Brazil
1600s 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% Tanzania
1700s 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Tanzania
1710s 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Tanzania
1720s 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Tanzania
1730s 0.1% 0.4% 0.3% Tanzania
1740s 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% Tanzania
1750s 0.2% 0.4% 0.2% Tanzania
1760s 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% Tanzania
1770s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Tanzania
1780s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Tanzania
1790s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Tanzania
1800s 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Tanzania
1810s 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% Brazil
1820s 0.4% 0.3% 0.1% Brazil
1830s 0.5% 0.3% 0.1% Brazil
1840s 0.5% 0.4% 0.1% Brazil
1850s 0.6% 0.4% 0.2% Brazil
1860s 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% Brazil
1870s 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% Brazil
1880s 0.9% 0.4% 0.5% Brazil
1890s 1.0% 0.3% 0.7% Brazil
1900s 1.2% 0.3% 0.9% Brazil
1910s 1.3% 0.3% 1.1% Brazil
1920s 1.5% 0.3% 1.3% Brazil
1930s 1.7% 0.3% 1.4% Brazil
1940s 2.0% 0.3% 1.7% Brazil
1950s 2.3% 0.3% 1.9% Brazil
1960s 2.5% 0.3% 2.2% Brazil
1970s 2.6% 0.4% 2.2% Brazil
1980s 2.8% 0.5% 2.3% Brazil
1990s 2.8% 0.5% 2.3% Brazil
2000s 2.8% 0.6% 2.2% Brazil
2010s 2.7% 0.7% 2.0% Brazil
2020s 2.6% 0.8% 1.7% Brazil
2030s 2.5% 1.0% 1.4% Brazil
2040s 2.3% 1.2% 1.1% Brazil
2050s 2.2% 1.4% 0.7% Brazil
2060s 2.0% 1.7% 0.4% Brazil
2070s 1.9% 1.9% 0.0% Tanzania
2080s 1.8% 2.2% 0.4% Tanzania
2090s 1.7% 2.4% 0.8% Tanzania
2100s 1.6% 2.6% 1.0% Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global co₂ emissions and population, Brazil or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 2.6% against 1.6% in Brazil as of 2100.
What is the difference in share of global co₂ emissions and population between Brazil and Tanzania?
1.0%, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania?
318 years are reported by both, from 1000 to 2100.
How do Brazil and Tanzania rank globally for share of global co₂ emissions and population?
Brazil ranks 13th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 239 countries.
Where does this data come from?
HYDE (2023); Gapminder (2022); UN WPP (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of global CO₂ emissions and population. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tanzania: Share of global CO₂ emissions and population. Statizoid, drawing on HYDE (2023); Gapminder (2022); UN WPP (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/share-co2-vs-population/brazil/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/share-co2-vs-population/brazil/tanzania/">Brazil vs Tanzania: Share of global CO₂ emissions and population</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of global CO₂ emissions and population
Unit
%
Source
HYDE (2023); Gapminder (2022); UN WPP (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
239 places, 69,170 data points, 1000–2100
Last refreshed

Share of the world's population by country, available from 10,000 BCE to 2100, based on data and estimates from different sources.