Aruba vs Zimbabwe: Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from burning gas
Aruba
0.0%
in 1985
Zimbabwe
0.0%
in 1963
Aruba rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
131st
Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from burning gas over time
- Aruba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 146 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1930s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1940s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1950s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 1960s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global cumulative co₂ emissions from burning gas, Aruba or Zimbabwe?
- Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zimbabwe as of 1985.
- What is the difference in share of global cumulative co₂ emissions from burning gas between Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Zimbabwe?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1926 to 1963.
- How do Aruba and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of global cumulative co₂ emissions from burning gas?
- Aruba ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of global cumulative CO₂ emissions from burning gas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from gas since the first year of available data, measured as a percentage of global cumulative emissions of CO₂ from gas.