American Samoa vs Saint Pierre and Miquelon: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- American Samoa
- Saint Pierre and Miquelon
How they compare
American Samoa currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Pierre and Miquelon, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes American Samoa's figure about 1.7 times Saint Pierre and Miquelon's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, American Samoa has been ahead every year.
American Samoa ranks 208th and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 209th of 217 countries.
American Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | American Samoa | Saint Pierre and Miquelon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | American Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | American Samoa |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | American Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, American Samoa or Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- American Samoa, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Saint Pierre and Miquelon as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between American Samoa and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- 0.0%, with American Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for American Samoa and Saint Pierre and Miquelon?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do American Samoa and Saint Pierre and Miquelon rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- American Samoa ranks 208th and Saint Pierre and Miquelon ranks 209th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.