Bangladesh vs Venezuela: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Bangladesh
1.0%
in 2015
Venezuela
0.9%
in 2015
Bangladesh rank
21st
Venezuela rank
23rd
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Bangladesh
- Venezuela
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 1.0% against 0.9% in Venezuela, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Venezuela's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Venezuela ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 21st and Venezuela ranks 23rd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Venezuela in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | Venezuela |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.1% | Venezuela |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.1% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Bangladesh or Venezuela?
- Bangladesh, at 1.0% against 0.9% in Venezuela as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Bangladesh and Venezuela?
- 0.1%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Venezuela?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Bangladesh and Venezuela rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Bangladesh ranks 21st and Venezuela ranks 23rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.