Belarus vs Ecuador: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Belarus
0.3%
in 2015
Ecuador
0.3%
in 2015
Belarus rank
50th
Ecuador rank
51st

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
00.10.20.30.4199020022015

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 51st of 217 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% Ecuador
2000s 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Ecuador
2010s 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Belarus or Ecuador?
Belarus, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Ecuador as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Belarus and Ecuador?
0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Belarus ranks 50th and Ecuador ranks 51st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.