Belarus vs Netherlands: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Belarus
0.3%
in 2015
Netherlands
0.3%
in 2015
Belarus rank
50th
Netherlands rank
53rd
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Belarus
- Netherlands
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 50th and Netherlands ranks 53rd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.0% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Belarus or Netherlands?
- Belarus, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Netherlands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Belarus and Netherlands?
- 0.0%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Netherlands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Belarus and Netherlands rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Belarus ranks 50th and Netherlands ranks 53rd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.