Belarus vs Uganda: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Belarus
0.3%
in 2015
Uganda
0.3%
in 2015
Belarus rank
50th
Uganda rank
48th

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Belarus
  • Uganda
00.10.20.30.4199020022015

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Belarus, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 217 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% Belarus
2000s 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% Belarus
2010s 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Belarus or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Belarus as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Belarus and Uganda?
0.0%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Belarus ranks 50th and Uganda ranks 48th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.