Bolivia vs Peru: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Bolivia
0.7%
in 2015
Peru
0.7%
in 2015
Bolivia rank
34th
Peru rank
33rd

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Bolivia
  • Peru
00.250.50.7511.2199020022015

How they compare

Peru currently reports 0.7% against 0.7% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Peru ahead.

Bolivia ranks 34th and Peru ranks 33rd of 217 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6% 0.7% 0.1% Peru
2000s 0.8% 0.6% 0.2% Bolivia
2010s 0.8% 0.7% 0.1% Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Bolivia or Peru?
Peru, at 0.7% against 0.7% in Bolivia as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Bolivia and Peru?
0.0%, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Peru?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Bolivia and Peru rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Bolivia ranks 34th and Peru ranks 33rd of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.