Congo vs Iraq: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Congo
0.2%
in 2015
Iraq
0.2%
in 2015
Congo rank
66th
Iraq rank
69th

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Congo
  • Iraq
00.10.20.3199020022015

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.2% against 0.2% in Iraq, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Iraq's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 66th and Iraq ranks 69th of 217 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Iraq Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% Congo
2000s 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% Congo
2010s 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Congo or Iraq?
Congo, at 0.2% against 0.2% in Iraq as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Congo and Iraq?
0.0%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iraq?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Congo and Iraq rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Congo ranks 66th and Iraq ranks 69th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.