Faroe Islands vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Faroe Islands
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.2 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Faroe Islands ranks 202nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 199th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Faroe Islands | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Faroe Islands |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Faroe Islands or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Faroe Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Faroe Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Faroe Islands and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Faroe Islands ranks 202nd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 199th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.