Gibraltar vs Sao Tome and Principe: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Gibraltar
0.0%
in 2015
Sao Tome and Principe
0.0%
in 2015
Gibraltar rank
200th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
197th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Gibraltar
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Gibraltar, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 200th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 197th of 217 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Gibraltar or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Gibraltar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Gibraltar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Gibraltar and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Gibraltar ranks 200th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 197th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.