Gibraltar vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Gibraltar
0.0%
in 2015
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.0%
in 2015
Gibraltar rank
200th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
199th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Gibraltar
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Gibraltar, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 200th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 199th of 217 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Gibraltar or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Gibraltar as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Gibraltar and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Gibraltar ranks 200th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 199th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.