Kiribati vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Kiribati
0.0%
in 2015
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0%
in 2015
Kiribati rank
205th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
206th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Kiribati
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 205th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 206th of 217 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Kiribati or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Kiribati, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Kiribati and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Kiribati ranks 205th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 206th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.