Lesotho vs Luxembourg: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Lesotho
0.0%
in 2015
Luxembourg
0.0%
in 2015
Lesotho rank
159th
Luxembourg rank
156th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Lesotho
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Lesotho, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lesotho ahead.
Lesotho ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 156th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Lesotho or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Lesotho as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 0.0%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Luxembourg?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Lesotho and Luxembourg rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Lesotho ranks 159th and Luxembourg ranks 156th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.