Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food

Mongolia
0.3%
in 2015
Zimbabwe
0.3%
in 2015
Mongolia rank
60th
Zimbabwe rank
58th

Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zimbabwe
0.10.20.30.4199020022015

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.3% against 0.3% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0%.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 217 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Zimbabwe
2000s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Zimbabwe
2010s 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.3% against 0.3% in Mongolia as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
0.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
Mongolia ranks 60th and Zimbabwe ranks 58th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.