Tuvalu vs Wallis and Futuna: Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food
Tuvalu
0.0%
in 2015
Wallis and Futuna
0.0%
in 2015
Tuvalu rank
213th
Wallis and Futuna rank
210th
Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food over time
- Tuvalu
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Wallis and Futuna currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Wallis and Futuna's figure about 2.4 times Tuvalu's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Wallis and Futuna has been ahead every year.
Tuvalu ranks 213th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 210th of 217 countries.
Wallis and Futuna has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tuvalu | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Wallis and Futuna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food, Tuvalu or Wallis and Futuna?
- Wallis and Futuna, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tuvalu as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food between Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna?
- 0.0%, with Wallis and Futuna ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Tuvalu and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food?
- Tuvalu ranks 213th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 210th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of global greenhouse gas emissions from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.