Algeria vs Sri Lanka: Share of children who are stunted vs. CO₂ emissions per capita
Algeria
9.8%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
10.5%
in 2024
Algeria rank
75th
Sri Lanka rank
73rd
Share of children who are stunted vs. CO₂ emissions per capita over time
- Algeria
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 10.5% against 9.8% in Algeria, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 1987 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Algeria ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 97 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 16.9% | 31.2% | 14.3% | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 22.6% | 26.1% | 3.5% | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 23.6% | 18.3% | 5.3% | Algeria |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 11.5% | 0.8% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of children who are stunted vs. co₂ emissions per capita, Algeria or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 10.5% against 9.8% in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of children who are stunted vs. co₂ emissions per capita between Algeria and Sri Lanka?
- 0.7%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Sri Lanka?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Sri Lanka rank globally for share of children who are stunted vs. co₂ emissions per capita?
- Algeria ranks 75th and Sri Lanka ranks 73rd of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization - Global Health Observatory (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of children who are stunted vs. CO₂ emissions per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The share of children younger than five who are stunted – significantly shorter than the average for their age, as a consequence of poor nutrition and/or repeated infection.