Austria vs Belgium: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Austria
0 kt per person
in 2023
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2023
Austria rank
161st
Belgium rank
164th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Austria's figure about 2.3 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 161st and Belgium ranks 164th of 167 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Austria |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Austria or Belgium?
- Austria, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Austria and Belgium?
- 0 kt per person, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Austria ranks 161st and Belgium ranks 164th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.