Belgium vs Germany: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2023
Germany
0 kt per person
in 2023
Belgium rank
164th
Germany rank
162nd
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Belgium
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.7 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 164th and Germany ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Germany |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Germany |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Belgium or Germany?
- Germany, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Belgium and Germany?
- 0 kt per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Belgium ranks 164th and Germany ranks 162nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.