Belgium vs Lesotho: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2023
Lesotho
0 kt per person
in 2023
Belgium rank
164th
Lesotho rank
163rd
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Belgium
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.4 times Belgium's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 164th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 167 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Belgium or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Belgium and Lesotho?
- 0 kt per person, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lesotho?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Lesotho rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Belgium ranks 164th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.