Czechia vs Iceland: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Czechia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Iceland
0 kt per person
in 2023
Czechia rank
78th
Iceland rank
75th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Czechia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 78th and Iceland ranks 75th of 167 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Czechia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Czechia and Iceland?
- 0 kt per person, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iceland?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Iceland rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Czechia ranks 78th and Iceland ranks 75th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.