Ecuador vs Rwanda: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
44th
Rwanda rank
47th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Rwanda
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.
Ecuador ranks 44th and Rwanda ranks 47th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Ecuador or Rwanda?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 44th and Rwanda ranks 47th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.