Eswatini vs Niger: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2023
Niger
0 kt per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
130th
Niger rank
132nd
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Niger
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Niger, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Niger ahead.
Eswatini ranks 130th and Niger ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Eswatini or Niger?
- Eswatini, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Niger as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Eswatini and Niger?
- 0 kt per person, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Niger?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Niger rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 130th and Niger ranks 132nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.