Kazakhstan vs Monaco: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Kazakhstan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Monaco
0 kt per person
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
122nd
Monaco rank
119th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Monaco's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 122nd and Monaco ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Monaco |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Monaco |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Kazakhstan or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Kazakhstan and Monaco?
- 0 kt per person, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Monaco?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Monaco rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 122nd and Monaco ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.