Luxembourg vs Poland: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Luxembourg
0 kt per person
in 2023
Poland
0 kt per person
in 2023
Luxembourg rank
100th
Poland rank
103rd
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Poland
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Poland, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 100th and Poland ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Luxembourg or Poland?
- Luxembourg, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Luxembourg and Poland?
- 0 kt per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Poland?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Poland rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 100th and Poland ranks 103rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.