Myanmar vs Senegal: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Myanmar
0 kt per person
in 2023
Senegal
0 kt per person
in 2023
Myanmar rank
91st
Senegal rank
89th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Myanmar
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Myanmar, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 91st and Senegal ranks 89th of 167 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Senegal |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Senegal |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Senegal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita, Myanmar or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita between Myanmar and Senegal?
- 0 kt per person, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Senegal?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Senegal rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Myanmar ranks 91st and Senegal ranks 89th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.