Aruba vs Monaco: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0133 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Monaco
0.0403 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
4th
Monaco rank
1st

Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Monaco
0.010.020.030.04199020062023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 0.0403 kt per square kilometre against 0.0133 kt per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.027 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Monaco's figure about 3.0 times Aruba's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 4th and Monaco ranks 1st of 167 countries.

Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Monaco Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0121 kt per square kilometre 0.0342 kt per square kilometre 0.0221 kt per square kilometre Monaco
2000s 0.013 kt per square kilometre 0.0387 kt per square kilometre 0.0257 kt per square kilometre Monaco
2010s 0.0132 kt per square kilometre 0.0406 kt per square kilometre 0.0274 kt per square kilometre Monaco
2020s 0.0132 kt per square kilometre 0.0405 kt per square kilometre 0.0273 kt per square kilometre Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Aruba or Monaco?
Monaco, at 0.0403 kt per square kilometre against 0.0133 kt per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Aruba and Monaco?
0.027 kt per square kilometre, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Monaco?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Monaco rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 4th and Monaco ranks 1st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Monaco: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/solid-food-waste-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/aruba/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/solid-food-waste-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/aruba/monaco/">Aruba vs Monaco: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 5,552 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.