Rwanda vs Tunisia: Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Rwanda
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Tunisia
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Rwanda rank
47th
Tunisia rank
49th
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 49th of 167 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.0003 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher solid food waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Rwanda, at 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Tunisia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in solid food waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 0 kt per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for solid food waste — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 47th and Tunisia ranks 49th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Solid Food Waste — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.