Costa Rica vs Lebanon: Sorghum — Crop residues
Sorghum — Crop residues over time
- Costa Rica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 2.0 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0018 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0015 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 0.0049 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0046 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 0.0054 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0052 kt | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0004 kt | 0.0001 kt | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sorghum — crop residues, Costa Rica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 0.0002 kt against 0.0001 kt in Costa Rica as of 2050.
- What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues between Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 0.0001 kt, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lebanon?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Costa Rica and Lebanon rank globally for sorghum — crop residues?
- Costa Rica ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 92nd of 112 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sorghum — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).