Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sorghum — Crop residues (Emissions N2O)

Australia
0.4913 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
4.87 kt
in 2050
Australia rank
12th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
9th

Sorghum — Crop residues (Emissions N2O) over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
012345196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 4.87 kt against 0.4913 kt in Australia, a difference of 4.38 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 9.9 times Australia's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 112 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0654 kt 0.9924 kt 0.927 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 0.2377 kt 1.05 kt 0.8135 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 0.3174 kt 1.18 kt 0.8614 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 0.2688 kt 1.84 kt 1.57 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.4354 kt 2.49 kt 2.05 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 0.336 kt 3.9 kt 3.57 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 0.3417 kt 4.13 kt 3.79 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 0.4624 kt 3.74 kt 3.27 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 0.4913 kt 4.87 kt 4.38 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sorghum — crop residues, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 4.87 kt against 0.4913 kt in Australia as of 2050.
What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
4.38 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for sorghum — crop residues?
Australia ranks 12th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 9th of 112 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Sorghum — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sorghum — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Sorghum — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sorghum — Crop residues (Emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 8,807 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).