China, Taiwan Province of vs Zambia: Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate

China, Taiwan Province of
-29.08 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zambia
-39.89 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
114th
Zambia rank
117th

Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Zambia
0200400600196219922023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports -29.08 % change on previous year against -39.89 % change on previous year in Zambia, a difference of 10.81 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zambia ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 117th of 125 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 7.58 % change on previous year 1.86 % change on previous year 5.73 % change on previous year China, Taiwan Province of
1970s 2.54 % change on previous year -2.17 % change on previous year 4.7 % change on previous year China, Taiwan Province of
1980s 37.91 % change on previous year 10.18 % change on previous year 27.73 % change on previous year China, Taiwan Province of
1990s -6.49 % change on previous year -0.9586 % change on previous year 5.53 % change on previous year Zambia
2000s -28.02 % change on previous year 4.6 % change on previous year 32.61 % change on previous year Zambia
2010s 58.87 % change on previous year -3.72 % change on previous year 62.59 % change on previous year China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 3.2 % change on previous year 49.79 % change on previous year 46.59 % change on previous year Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sorghum — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate, China, Taiwan Province of or Zambia?
China, Taiwan Province of, at -29.08 % change on previous year against -39.89 % change on previous year in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in sorghum — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate between China, Taiwan Province of and Zambia?
10.81 % change on previous year, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Zambia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Zambia rank globally for sorghum — crop residues (n content), annual growth rate?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 114th and Zambia ranks 117th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Zambia: Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-taiwan-province-of/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sorghum-crop-residues-n-content-annual-growth-rate/china-taiwan-province-of/zambia/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Zambia: Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sorghum — Crop residues (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
158 places, 8,322 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sorghum — Crop residues (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.