Ecuador vs Lithuania: Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per capita
Ecuador
0 kt per person
in 2023
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
54th
Lithuania rank
55th
Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Lithuania
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 87 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soya beans — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per capita, Ecuador or Lithuania?
- Ecuador, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per capita between Ecuador and Lithuania?
- 0 kt per person, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Lithuania rank globally for soya beans — crop residues (direct emissions n2o), per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 55th of 87 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Soya beans — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.