New Zealand vs Suriname: Soya beans — Crop residues
Soya beans — Crop residues over time
- New Zealand
- Suriname
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Suriname, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1974 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 90th of 98 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher soya beans — crop residues, New Zealand or Suriname?
- New Zealand, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Suriname as of 1986.
- What is the difference in soya beans — crop residues between New Zealand and Suriname?
- 0 kt, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Suriname?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 1986.
- How do New Zealand and Suriname rank globally for soya beans — crop residues?
- New Zealand ranks 90th and Suriname ranks 90th of 98 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Soya beans — Crop residues (Emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).