Central America vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … Biomass annual growth rate

Central America
0.4003 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
6.75 % change on previous year
in 2023
Central America rank
17th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … Biomass annual growth rate over time

  • Central America
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300196219922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6.75 % change on previous year against 0.4003 % change on previous year in Central America, a difference of 6.35 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 16.9 times Central America's.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Central America ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 30 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central America averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central America Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 4.89 % change on previous year 25.59 % change on previous year 20.7 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1970s 1.83 % change on previous year 4.99 % change on previous year 3.15 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1980s 0.4463 % change on previous year 3.89 % change on previous year 3.44 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
1990s 2.24 % change on previous year 19.02 % change on previous year 16.78 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 1.18 % change on previous year -1.37 % change on previous year 2.55 % change on previous year Central America
2010s 1.5 % change on previous year 8.51 % change on previous year 7.01 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -0.8972 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year 4.09 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Central America or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6.75 % change on previous year against 0.4003 % change on previous year in Central America as of 2023.
What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Central America and Zimbabwe?
6.35 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central America and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Central America and Zimbabwe rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Central America ranks 17th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central America vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/central-america/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/sugar-cane-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/central-america/zimbabwe/">Central America vs Zimbabwe: Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
146 places, 8,208 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.