Eswatini vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … Biomass annual growth rate
Sugar cane: Burning crop residues … Biomass annual growth rate over time
- Eswatini
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 2.02 % change on previous year against -4.63 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 6.65 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 30th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th of 116 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 17.42 % change on previous year | 5.61 % change on previous year | 11.81 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 1970s | 4.82 % change on previous year | 3.55 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 5.43 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | 3.59 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1.06 % change on previous year | 0.2363 % change on previous year | 0.8202 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 2.84 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | 1.42 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1.29 % change on previous year | 2.34 % change on previous year | 1.06 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | -0.2072 % change on previous year | -0.3858 % change on previous year | 0.1786 % change on previous year | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Eswatini or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Eswatini, at 2.02 % change on previous year against -4.63 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Eswatini and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 6.65 % change on previous year, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for sugar cane — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- Eswatini ranks 30th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 27th of 116 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sugar cane — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.